Controversies of CBFC
The body of Indian film censoring, the Central Board of Film Certification or CBFC, has just strengthened its restrictions by requiring No-Objection Certificates, or NOCs, from politicians in order to greenlight any movies made about them. Of course, this is disturbing and discouraging to filmmakers, specifically those who specialize in documentaries.
For example, Khushboo Ranka and Vinay Shukla, the creators of the movie An Insignificant Man, which trails the political journey of Arvind Kejriwal, began the making of their film without realizing that the head of the CBFC, Pahlaj Nihalani, would ask them for NOCs from not only Kejriwal himself, but also Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Shelia Dixit, the former Chief Minister of Delhi.
Shukla and Ranka were outraged at the CBFC’s “ridiculous demand”, and began to be discouraged about making documentaries in general, since the makers of them are always punished for doing it. Their case isn’t the only example of tight bars being kept around real-life references either.
The movie Udta Punjab was asked to remove all references to Punjab itself, Sonakshi Sinha’s movie Noor had to remove Barkha Dutt because any references to real-life characters without consent of the censors were not permitted, and Modi Ka Gaon required NOCs from both the Prime Minister’s Office (or PMO) and the Election Commission.
Some films have won their battles against the CBFC, with the Bombay High Court even intervening in the case of Udta Punjab and saying they are not able to censor films.
People over the years have been bringing forth the true nature of the CBFC and Nihalani’s decisions, and sharply criticizing his ways. Nihalani, in defending himself, has said that he is also aiming to preserve the culture and tradition of the country.
However, his decisions come across as incredibly controversial, such as his tag of Alankrita Shrivastava’s Lipstick Under My Burkha as too “lady-oriented” and redlighting the film, which greatly angered Shrivastava until FCAT allowed it to be greenlighted.
Thus, filmmakers all around the Indian movie industry are discouraged from many of their ideas, under the fear that the censoring boards will just kill them.
Shukla expresses her frustration at the nature of the film culture being created around this, where meaningful and questioning work could forcibly be reduced to tasteless wastes of time, and wondering what filmmakers like them are to do about it.
Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay(Free for commercial use)
You may also like
Image Reference: https://pixabay.com/illustrations/censored-secret-confidential-1726364/
Recent Posts
- RVNL Recruitment 2025 for manager and other postsA total of 12 full-time vacancies are available at RVNL's corporate office in New Delhi.
- Assam set to become India’s first state-level oil producerAssam is poised to become the first state government in the country to participate in oil production.
- Akash Prime missile scores direct hits in successful Ladakh trialsOn July 16, the Indian Army's Army Air Defence unit conducted successful trials of the Akash Prime missile in the Ladakh region. Developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the missile demonstrated high accuracy by delivering two direct hits on target during the exercise, according to defence sources.
- RVNL Recruitment 2025 for manager and other posts
What’s new at WeRIndia.com
News from 700+ sources
-
Empower women, free them from regressive traditions: RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat
-
Embodiment of auspiciousness
-
Why Prada and other luxury brands keep getting India wrong
-
Trump sues Murdoch, WSJ over story on alleged 2003 letter to Epstein
-
Former West Bengal BJP President Dilip Ghosh says party did not invite him to PM rally, gives it a miss
-
Shannon Sharpe wife, net worth, children: Will NFL legend return to ESPN after sexual assault lawsuit settlement?
-
WeRIndia – A News Aggregator
Visit werindia.com for all types of National | Business | World | Politics | Entertainment | Health related news and much more..
Leave a Reply